SEEING THREW SOUND

Human echolocation is an ability of humans to detect objects in their environment by sensing echoes from those objects. By actively creating sounds – for example, by tapping their canes, lightly stomping their foot or making clicking noises with their mouths – people trained to orientate with echolocation can interpret the sound waves reflected by nearby objects, accurately identifying their location and size. This ability is used by some blind people for acoustic wayfinding, or navigating within their environment using auditory rather than visual cues. It is similar in principle to active sonar and to the animal echolocation employed by some animals, including bats, dolphins and toothed whales.

Echolocation has been further developed by Daniel Kish, who works with the blind, leading blind teenagers hiking and mountain-biking through the wilderness and teaching them how to navigate new locations safely, with a technique that he calls "FlashSonar",[11] through the non-profit organization World Access for The Blind.[12] Kish had his eyes removed at the age of 13 months due to retinal cancer. He learned to make palatal clicks with his tongue when he was still a child -- and now trains other blind people in the use of echolocation and in what he calls "Perceptual Mobility".[13][14][15] Though at first resistant to using a cane for mobility, seeing it as a "handicapped" device, and considering himself "not handicapped at all", Kish developed a technique using his white cane combined with echolocation to further expand his mobility.[15][16][16][14]

Kish reports that "The sense of imagery is very rich for an experienced user. One can get a sense of beauty or starkness or whatever - from sound as well as echo".[11] He is able to distinguish a metal fence from a wooden one by the information returned by the echoes on the arrangement of the fence structures; in extremely quiet conditions, he can also hear the warmer and duller quality of the echoes from wood compared to metal.[11]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_echolocation

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGMpswJtCdI&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpxEmD0gu0Q&feature=related

The Commercial Church 

Sincerely as a human person I can not understand the church.  Sometimes it wants to be populist and I ask myself whether the fact that it does not point out things in black and white to form a base on certain things on which to do forward thinking is done on the principle of lack of thought or as a strategy. I believe that a black and white format is important.  Still this does not mean that a person can not go to a priest to try to help him or her to solve there religious dilemma that they have and perhaps find an answer to his unique situations for her/his unique self and find the gray shades.

An example is simple the fact of :

“Echoing what the Pope said in Milan last June, Bishop Grech reiterated that the Church loved re-married divorcees. It is essential that this love is communicated in such a way that these couple feel it. They need to see and feel that they are loved. The Pope had said it was up to the parish church and the Catholic community to do all they could to make these people felt loved and accepted, even if they could not receive the Eucharist.”

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20121020/blogs/good-news-irregular-couples-and-much-else-in-between.441783

But simple they don't state whether being divorced and remarried is sinful to keep people in doubt and due to the fact not to legitimise divorce because if the church say it is not sinful it justifies it. In my opinion here the church is a commercial entity. It is like a political party that promises the rich that he will oppress the poor and promising the poor that he will steal from the rich believing that in this case it is not stealing. It is without position till my knowledge concerns as I never heard the Pope "chi divorzia e un pecatore." and if he says that he must say as well "anche io sonno un grande pecatore e va benne perche quado noi siamo a conosenza di questo che posiamo andare a Gesu."

Personally here I'm not saying that divorce is sinful not at all. I'm just saying that the church wants to sell Christ to everybody and does not clear states its boundaries or her position clearly. Perhaps this is because of the times of confusion we are in. This is because if I sin and live with mortal sin according to Rome I can not be one with Jesus 

 the truth as I'm not living by the Words of Jesus Christ and I'm out of the vine. Because I am either with Christ or not I'm either with the truth or not and this goes for three quarters of the church who fidels with the persona that they are in the truth himself that include cardinal, bishop priets and people in all countries.

In the end who knows whether they sold themselves to the devils and to organisations and brotherhoods even bishops of remote islands you never know. Again in all this till know they never clarified as the family is attacked by the devil we only needed for the church to do this not to be clear and to put uncertainty and not be clear on basic issues and whether it would be on the pastoral care and the theology itself although theology itself develops. Therefore we end up with confusion whether a divorced remarried man or woman can therefore live according to Jesus Christ if they marry again crossfigered that they are on the right side of history. But fact reamains  that all this may be all farce and a farce of everything whether the church or state and marriage itself as the people that react socio dynamically and everything will continue therefore to become a farce and when states remaries the church and then decides to divorce her the farce continues and then remaries her again such farce of a system created by humans that are more political oriented and agenda too then trying to be in harmony with truth  searching truth itself base on true inner core value and that are more image based rather then trying to be authentic and be who they really are in the truth as possible as they can.